Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculty & Research Faculty & Research
Master’s programs Master’s programs
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
PhD Program PhD Program
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
About HEC
Overview Overview
Who
We Are
Who
We Are
Égalité des chances Égalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversity
& Inclusion
Diversity
& Inclusion
The HEC
Foundation
The HEC
Foundation
Campus life Campus life
Activity Reports Activity Reports
Summer School
Youth Programs Youth Programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculty & Research
Overview Overview
Faculty Directory Faculty Directory
Departments Departments
Centers Centers
Chairs Chairs
Grants Grants
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Master’s programs
Master in
Management
Master in
Management
Master's
Programs
Master's
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Summer
Programs
Summer
Programs
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Student
Life
Student
Life
Our
Difference
Our
Difference
Bachelor Programs
Overview Overview
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
PhD Program
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
FAQ FAQ
Executive Education
Home Home
About us About us
Management topics Management topics
Open Programs Open Programs
Custom Programs Custom Programs
Events/News Events/News
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
Overview Overview
Executive programs Executive programs
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
Article

Manufacturing Innovation Drives Pharma Sales

Operations Management
Published on:

New evidence shows that drugmakers can protect profitability by making process improvements to cut costs and strengthen the resilience of critical supply chains in the face of political pressure to ‘reshore’ operations and shortages of key ingredients amid coronavirus.

pharma - cover

Photo Credits: Nastya Dulhiier on Unsplash

The coronavirus crisis exposed America’s and Europe’s overdependence on other countries for cheap medical products. China, for one, manufactures key ingredients in the global supply chain for a range of drugs. The shortages of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), caused by extended factory closures in China and export limitations in India, have driven up the cost of drug manufacture, just as the pandemic sent demand for medicines soaring.
 
Politicians from across America and much of Europe have raised concerns about the national security implications of sourcing medical supplies from overseas. Medical supply chains are designed for efficiency and price competition, but governments have leaned on corporations to “reshore” operations from China and elsewhere.
 
Pharmaceutical companies are, largely, opposed to the idea. Reshaping global supply chains could take years and incur significant costs. One way corporations could bring some production back home is through applying a new technology or method to achieve gains in manufacturing performance. This is known as process innovation.
 
So far, research has focused on product innovation, or the development of new drugs. Our study aims to shed light on the economic impact of process innovation. And we found a positive association between process innovation and sales of APIs for cancer drugs that have gone off patent protection. Process innovation enables corporations to produce APIs in a more efficient way, which means they can lower drug prices. Our findings suggest this also boosts market share.

 

Process innovation enables corporations to produce active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in a more efficient way, which means they can lower drug prices.


 
The study has important implications for the pharmaceutical industry and wider society, given the critical role that drugs play in the safeguard of public health. In addition, the sector is a major driver of economic growth and employment. For pharmaceutical firms that incur huge research and development costs to bring a new drug to market and where even among once promising products that receive regulatory approval few become blockbuster hits to provide a return on investment, process (rather than product) innovation can be an important way to ensure future growth.

 

For pharmaceutical firms that incur huge research and development costs, process (rather than product) innovation can be an important way to ensure future growth.


 
Indeed, for complex APIs such as the ones considered in our study, manufacturing is widely considered to account for the bulk of drug manufacturing costs. Certainly, this has been the case for the Swiss pharmaceutical corporation Synbias Pharma. Traditionally, the company’s manufacturing process for the key ingredient in Idarubicin had a low yield — the efficiency with which the process could turn input to output through a series of chemical reactions. Through the introduction of an innovative production method the yield reached 30% from 5%. This catapulted Synbias Pharma to become the world market leader for Idarubicin, a generic drug used to treat some types of leukaemia and advanced breast cancer.  

However, process innovation is not without risks. The key challenges include ensuring consistent yields, product quality and overall process stability. Yet production plants are complex environments, and the nuances in equipment, procedures and people cannot be fully characterized ahead of time. Therefore, our analysis suggests that it is harder to implement process innovations that are more novel. So, coming up with entirely new manufacturing methods is riskier, but it offers higher potential economic benefit.
 

pharma - knowledge

Photo Credits: Pengyou on Adobe Stock


Patenting is another critical factor in the success of process innovation. In theory, manufacturing process patents (i.e., patents of new production methods) can help pharmaceutical companies to protect profits by having exclusive access to more efficient production processes. In reality, because patents are publicly available information, they can also provide hints to the competition about a firm’s production methods and encourage an effort to imitate or provide a base for new development. In response, corporations can attempt to develop production methods in a more general way, to throw rivals off the scent. The degree of difficulty for competitors to copy a similar process without patent infringement is known as “scope”. Broader scope would make it easier for companies to maintain exclusive access to innovative production methods.
 
Indeed, our findings show that firms with patented process innovations enjoy overall API sales that are substantially higher relative to non-process-innovative competitors. This is important, because legislation has considerably lowered the barriers to market entry for generic drug makers. In that context, pharma companies can protect their profitability by making (and patenting) process improvements to cut costs.

 

The degree of success will depend on the qualitative characteristics of the resulting innovation and the nature of the API being produced.


 
Nevertheless, our findings also suggest that the degree of success will depend on the qualitative characteristics of the resulting innovation and the nature of the API being produced. To revamp manufacturing processes, companies choose inputs such as solvents and operating conditions like temperature and pressure. How these production attributes interact with each other changes across APIs, where sometimes production risks and costs are very sensitive to small changes. When this is the case, identifying highly novel process innovations can be trickier for firms but our results suggest that the potential payoffs justify the required search efforts. For APIs where the interaction between production attributes is more predictable, our analysis indicates that innovating firms should make an extra effort to patent their discoveries in a sufficiently broad way so as to better fend off competition.  
 
Overall, despite the challenges associated with identifying, developing and deploying them, exclusive access to manufacturing process innovations carries important economic benefits for pharma firms in the form of higher sales. Our analysis suggests that the rewards outweigh the risks.  
 

Applications

Our results provide important practical insights that can inform the organization and execution of the R&D process across high-technology industries. In particular, while process innovations can be economically beneficial, investing in the development and deployment of especially novel production methods, without broad scope, could jeopardize payoffs, especially for products whose manufacturing processes tend to respond in a more predictable way to changes in production attributes.

Methodology

We studied APIs that have lost patent protection and are open to competition, so are more dependent on process improvements for driving profits. We collected quarterly sales data between 2005 and 2014 from 188 pharmaceutical corporations across four countries — the US, France, Spain and Italy — as well as 198 related process patents. We asked three leading patent lawyers to evaluate the novelty and scope of each patent portfolio. We used an API’s toxicity (formally defined as “occupational exposure limit based on API potency and hazardousness”) as a proxy for determining how sensitive a manufacturing process might be to changes in production attributes.
Based on an interview with Dimitrios Andritsos and his academic article “Manufacturing process innovation in the pharmaceutical industry” co-written with Ivan Lugovoi (PhD at HEC Paris) and Claire Senot (Tulane University).

Related content on Operations Management

iStock_mutarusan_management research
Sustainable Development

Bridging Sustainable Supply Chains with AI

By Sam Aflaki

Eloic Peyrache - HEC
Eloïc Peyrache
Professor, Dean
Aishwarya Karunakar
Graduate of the SASI MSc
Sustainable Development
Can ESG Save Life on Earth? Key Lessons
Helene Loning - HEC Paris
Hélène Löning
Associate Professor and Academic Director