Aller au contenu principal
A propos d'HEC A propos d'HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculté et Recherche Faculté et Recherche
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
Programme PhD Programme PhD
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
A propos d'HEC
En bref En bref
Qui sommes-nous ? Qui sommes-nous ?
Egalité des chances Egalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversité et inclusion Diversité et inclusion
Fondation HEC Fondation HEC
Vie du campus Vie du campus
Rapport d'activité Rapport d'activité
Summer School
Youth programs Youth programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculté et Recherche
À propos À propos
Corps professoral Corps professoral
Départements Départements
Centres Centres
Chaires Chaires
Financements Financements
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Grande Ecole
& Masters
Grande Ecole
Master in Management
Grande Ecole
Master in Management
Programmes
Masters
Programmes
Masters
Doubles
Diplômes
Doubles
Diplômes
Programmes
Bachelor
Programmes
Bachelor
Programmes
Summer
Programmes
Summer
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Vie
Etudiante
Vie
Etudiante
Notre
différence
Notre
différence
Bachelor Programs
Vue d'ensemble Vue d'ensemble
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
Programme PhD
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
FAQ FAQ
Executive Education
Accueil Accueil
Qui sommes-nous ? Qui sommes-nous ?
Univers de formation Univers de formation
Programmes Programmes
Offres entreprises Offres entreprises
Événements/Actualités Événements/Actualités
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
En bref En bref
Programmes Executive Programmes Executive
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
Faculté et Recherche

Anatoni Colicev - On campus - Room X120

07 juin
2024
10H45 - 12H00
Jouy-en-Josas
Anglais

Participer

Ajouter au calendrier
2024-06-07T10:45:00 2024-06-07T12:00:00 Anatoli Colicev - On campus - Room X120 - Exed building Marketing Research Seminar Speaker:  Anatoli Colicev Chair in Marketing, Strategy and Analytics University of Liverpool Title: How ESG Reduces Risk: The Role of Consumers and Institutional Investors Abstract: Practitioners regard firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performances as a crucial risk management practice. However, no empirical evidence has yet linked ESG performances to firm risk through different stakeholders. Drawing on stakeholder theory, the authors develop a conceptual framework that posits (1) asymmetric relationships between individual E, S, and G performances and customer-based brand equity (CBBE) and institutional investor ownership (IIO), (2) the moderating role of competitive intensity in these relationships, and (3) mediating roles of CBBE and IIO in the relationships between E, S, and G performances and firms’ idiosyncratic risk. Using quarterly data from 416 firms spanning 2012–2020, the authors find that CBBE and IIO indeed mediate the associations between ESG performance and idiosyncratic risk. While E performance has a positive and G performance a negative association with CBBE, E and S performances have a negative and G performance a positive association with IIO. Competitive intensity strengthens the association between S performance and CBBE and the association between E performance and IIO but weakens the association between G performance and both CBBE and IIO. The findings imply firms should carefully navigate the trade-offs associated with relationships between E, S, and G performances and multiple stakeholders. Jouy-en-Josas

Marketing Research Seminar

Speaker: 
Anatoli Colicev
Chair in Marketing, Strategy and Analytics
University of Liverpool

Title:
How ESG Reduces Risk: The Role of Consumers and Institutional Investors

Abstract:
Practitioners regard firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performances as a crucial risk management practice. However, no empirical evidence has yet linked ESG performances to firm risk through different stakeholders. Drawing on stakeholder theory, the authors develop a conceptual framework that posits (1) asymmetric relationships between individual E, S, and G performances and customer-based brand equity (CBBE) and institutional investor ownership (IIO), (2) the moderating role of competitive intensity in these relationships, and (3) mediating roles of CBBE and IIO in the relationships between E, S, and G performances and firms’ idiosyncratic risk. Using quarterly data from 416 firms spanning 2012–2020, the authors find that CBBE and IIO indeed mediate the associations between ESG performance and idiosyncratic risk. While E performance has a positive and G performance a negative association with CBBE, E and S performances have a negative and G performance a positive association with IIO. Competitive intensity strengthens the association between S performance and CBBE and the association between E performance and IIO but weakens the association between G performance and both CBBE and IIO. The findings imply firms should carefully navigate the trade-offs associated with relationships between E, S, and G performances and multiple stakeholders.

Participer

Ajouter au calendrier
2024-06-07T10:45:00 2024-06-07T12:00:00 Anatoli Colicev - On campus - Room X120 - Exed building Marketing Research Seminar Speaker:  Anatoli Colicev Chair in Marketing, Strategy and Analytics University of Liverpool Title: How ESG Reduces Risk: The Role of Consumers and Institutional Investors Abstract: Practitioners regard firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performances as a crucial risk management practice. However, no empirical evidence has yet linked ESG performances to firm risk through different stakeholders. Drawing on stakeholder theory, the authors develop a conceptual framework that posits (1) asymmetric relationships between individual E, S, and G performances and customer-based brand equity (CBBE) and institutional investor ownership (IIO), (2) the moderating role of competitive intensity in these relationships, and (3) mediating roles of CBBE and IIO in the relationships between E, S, and G performances and firms’ idiosyncratic risk. Using quarterly data from 416 firms spanning 2012–2020, the authors find that CBBE and IIO indeed mediate the associations between ESG performance and idiosyncratic risk. While E performance has a positive and G performance a negative association with CBBE, E and S performances have a negative and G performance a positive association with IIO. Competitive intensity strengthens the association between S performance and CBBE and the association between E performance and IIO but weakens the association between G performance and both CBBE and IIO. The findings imply firms should carefully navigate the trade-offs associated with relationships between E, S, and G performances and multiple stakeholders. Jouy-en-Josas