Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculty & Research Faculty & Research
Master’s programs Master’s programs
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
PhD Program PhD Program
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
About HEC
Overview Overview
Who
We Are
Who
We Are
Égalité des chances Égalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversity
& Inclusion
Diversity
& Inclusion
The HEC
Foundation
The HEC
Foundation
Campus life Campus life
Activity Reports Activity Reports
Summer School
Youth Programs Youth Programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculty & Research
Overview Overview
Faculty Directory Faculty Directory
Departments Departments
Centers Centers
Chairs Chairs
Grants Grants
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Master’s programs
Master in
Management
Master in
Management
Master's
Programs
Master's
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Summer
Programs
Summer
Programs
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Student
Life
Student
Life
Our
Difference
Our
Difference
Bachelor Programs
Overview Overview
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
PhD Program
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
FAQ FAQ
Executive Education
Home Home
About us About us
Management topics Management topics
Open Programs Open Programs
Custom Programs Custom Programs
Events/News Events/News
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
Overview Overview
Executive programs Executive programs
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
Article

Sales Force Compensation: The Weight of the Net

Marketing
Published on:

To ensure that sales force remain motivated, companies should increase the variable component of sales representatives’ salary for people operating in areas where fiscal policies translate as modest differences in compensation for more and less effective sales people. The performance of sales directors has a major impact on that of the sales force. Sales director compensation must reflect this fact.

Sales Force Compensation

In B2B industries, sales representatives play a critical role. They are the company’s ambassadors when they visit customers and the clients’ ambassadors when they return to the office. They must not only respond to customer needs, but also ensure that their companies keep the promises they have made—which is not always easy, given that the number of people involved in the sales process has significantly increased. As the company’s primary means to promote product sales, sales representatives are a highly strategic business issue. How much should they be paid to ensure their commitment and motivation? How can compensation schemes be adapted to specific fiscal contexts? Should sales directors also receive incentivized salaries?

Sales force compensation in BtoB industries

Given the specificities of this group of employees, considerable research has been conducted on how to determine their compensation. The following observations have been made:

• There is an information gap between sales representatives and their managers. The first group is, in fact, more knowledgeable than the second when it comes to customers, their potential, and the competition. Further, as sales reps are generally quite independent, it is difficult for managers to assess the challenges they have to deal with, evaluate their performance, and define suitable, motivating compensation schemes and levels.

• Manager/sales rep relationships are subject to the problems of any principal/agent relationship. The manager (the principal) hires a representative (the agent) to generate sales. These sales depend on the amount of effort the rep puts into the job, yet reps strive to maximize the utility of their efforts. In this context, an optimal compensation scheme would involve a variable component of salary that would serve to encourage efforts to make sales, and a fixed component that would provide reps with a degree of security.

Impact of taxation on sales force compensation

Most research has been conducted in North American countries, where low taxation levels mean little difference between what companies pay their sales force and these people’s take home salaries. Up until now, there have not been any studies that look at the impact of tax imposition levels on sales compensation levels and structures. Dominique Rouziès has considered this matter and found that:

1) Sales people are motivated by net compensation;

2) To motivate sales people, there must be a pay difference between those who perform the most and least less effectively. Yet, research show that the greater the tax pressures, the smaller the gap between the compensation of strong and weak performers. So in countries with high taxes, sales representatives may question whether their pay is truly commensurate with the amount of work provided. To counter the risk of demotivation, sales managers should increase the variable component in sales people’s total salary. This will serve to increase pay differences (that have been artificially reduced by taxes) between the most effective sales representatives and others. Still, a weighty variable component is not always ideal, because as work becomes more complex, performance becomes increasingly difficult to evaluate. That is why, when challenges are very tough and sales are particularly difficult to make, companies must ensure that a rep’s final salary depends more on its fixed component.

The importance of sales manager compensation

The question of sales manager compensation is equally important. Research reveals that the more effective the sales manager, the more effective his or her sales force. Sales managers thus have a high impact on organizational success. Rouziès explains that while a poor sales rep may be responsible for the dissatisfaction of a few customers, a poor manager will negatively influence a dozen and even a hundred sales representatives! Like CEOs, sales managers have far-reaching influence. This justifies generous compensation and explains why marginal growth rates increase according to the difficulty of their undertakings

Based on an interview with Dominique Rouziès and on her article “Determinants of Pay Level Structures in Sales Organizations” (forthcoming in Journal of Management , November 2009), coauthored with Anne T. Coughlan (professor of marketing, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, USA), Erin Anderson (former John H. Loudon professor of international management and professor of marketing at INSEAD, deceased November 21, 2007; the forthcoming article in Journal of Marketing is dedicated to her), and Dawn Iacobucci (E. Bronson Ingram professor of marketing, Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, USA).