Skip to main content
About HEC About HEC
Summer School Summer School
Faculty & Research Faculty & Research
Master’s programs Master’s programs
Bachelor Programs Bachelor Programs
MBA Programs MBA Programs
PhD Program PhD Program
Executive Education Executive Education
HEC Online HEC Online
About HEC
Overview Overview
Who
We Are
Who
We Are
Égalité des chances Égalité des chances
HEC Talents HEC Talents
International International
Sustainability Sustainability
Diversity
& Inclusion
Diversity
& Inclusion
The HEC
Foundation
The HEC
Foundation
Campus life Campus life
Activity Reports Activity Reports
Summer School
Youth Programs Youth Programs
Summer programs Summer programs
Online Programs Online Programs
Faculty & Research
Overview Overview
Faculty Directory Faculty Directory
Departments Departments
Centers Centers
Chairs Chairs
Grants Grants
Knowledge@HEC Knowledge@HEC
Master’s programs
Master in
Management
Master in
Management
Master's
Programs
Master's
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Double Degree
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Bachelor
Programs
Summer
Programs
Summer
Programs
Exchange
students
Exchange
students
Student
Life
Student
Life
Our
Difference
Our
Difference
Bachelor Programs
Overview Overview
Course content Course content
Admissions Admissions
Fees and Financing Fees and Financing
MBA Programs
MBA MBA
Executive MBA Executive MBA
TRIUM EMBA TRIUM EMBA
PhD Program
Overview Overview
HEC Difference HEC Difference
Program details Program details
Research areas Research areas
HEC Community HEC Community
Placement Placement
Job Market Job Market
Admissions Admissions
Financing Financing
FAQ FAQ
Executive Education
Home Home
About us About us
Management topics Management topics
Open Programs Open Programs
Custom Programs Custom Programs
Events/News Events/News
Contacts Contacts
HEC Online
Overview Overview
Executive programs Executive programs
MOOCs MOOCs
Summer Programs Summer Programs
Youth programs Youth programs
Instant

Who to Target? Latest Findings on Influencer Marketing

Marketing
Published on:

Who should I target? How to spread my content? Seeding is one of the most crucial questions in marketing today, according to Andreas Lanz, Assistant Professor of Marketing at HEC Paris, who focuses on this topic in most of his research. Professor Lanz and his colleagues answer these seeding questions at the annual ISMS Marketing Science Conference, which features several special sessions on influencer marketing this year – organized and co-chaired by Andreas Lanz. In this interview, Professor Lanz answers five questions on seeding, based on five research articles that will be presented at the conference.

influencer marketing - unsplash

©Carlos Muza on Unsplash

Micro influencers vs macro influencers: What does research say?

There is first empirical evidence that targeting micro influencers may be more effective than targeting macro influencers in the context of unpaid endorsements. In a recent article published in the Journal of Marketing Research, we find that targeting micro influencers is six times more effective than targeting macro influencers. This finding is especially relevant for small and medium-sized enterprises that don’t have the financial means to compensate influencers. Here is a short write-up of this article* on Forbes.

*“Climb or Jump: Status- Based Seeding in User-Generated Content Networks,” Andreas Lanz, Jacob Goldenberg, Daniel Shapira, and Florian Stahl (2019), Journal of Marketing Research, 56(3), 361–378.


Targeting micro influencers is six times more effective than targeting macro influencers.

 

How to increase responsiveness of such micro influencers in the context of unpaid endorsements? 

Our publication in the Journal of Marketing Research has left one great potential untouched: the value of the network. Therefore, in a follow-up project we asked ourselves how the value of the network can directly support seeding efforts. Interestingly, we find that the followers can serve as influence corridors to target their followers – and these friends of friends are generally much more responsive than random micro influencers. In fact, using data-based simulations, we find that targeting such “connected” micro influencers – the friends of friends – gives an effectiveness gain of 26% over targeting “unconnected” micro influencers.

*I will be presenting this project at the ISMS Marketing Science Conference: “Influence Corridors: A New Path to Seeding Targets in User-Generated Content Networks” by Jacob Goldenberg, Andreas Lanz, Daniel Shapira, and Florian Stahl.


Does this empirical finding in the context of unpaid endorsements also hold for paid endorsements?

This question is an extremely important one as compensations for influencer endorsements are surging and are expected to exceed 15B USD by 2022. In several field experiments on Instagram, we find supportive evidence that our empirical finding in the context of unpaid endorsements also holds for paid endorsements. Currently, we are also analyzing unique secondary data and it seems that there is convergent validity: macro influencers may indeed not be as effective, as mostly implicitly assumed.

*Maximilian Beichert will be presenting this project at the ISMS Marketing Science Conference: “Who to Target? Low- Versus High-Status Seeding in User-Generated Content Networks” by Maximilian Beichert, Andreas Bayerl, Jacob Goldenberg, and Andreas Lanz.


When targeting micro influencers, how to control their content creation in order to maximize their value? 

In influencer marketing, there exists an agency problem, because the goals of influencers may very well deviate from the ones of managers buying the endorsements. Hence, the question is how to control influencers. Typically, managers send out influencer briefings providing guidelines for the endorsements they intend to buy. In these briefings, managers can constrain influencers in their content creation. Based on our empirical analysis of endorsements on Instagram, we find that imposing stronger constraints with respect to content creation are associated with higher engagement with the Instagram posts.

*Reto Hofstetter will be presenting this project at the ISMS Marketing Science Conference: “Influencing on Short Leashes: How Contract Design Drives Influencer Marketing Performance” by Reto Hofstetter, Andreas Lanz, Navdeep Sahni, and Martin Faltl.


We suggest targeting individuals before they become influencers, using predictions including deep learning, and buy future endorsements from these prospective influencers while they are still unknown.


In case one wants to target macro influencers nevertheless, is there a way to reduce costs?

Yes, there is. However, we propose a rather unconventional way, because we suggest an entirely new influencer marketing approach where a manager should engage prospective influencers, as opposed to actual influencers. In fact, we suggest targeting new sign-ups, that is, individuals before they become influencers, using predictions including deep learning, and buy future endorsements from these prospective influencers while they are still unknown. In a way, we introduce the notion of future in the influencer marketing domain, which heavily reduces costs. Our empirical application shows that this approach can – besides reducing costs – generate significant profits.

*Daniel Shapira will be presenting this project at the ISMS Marketing Science Conference: “Future Endorsements of Prospective Influencers as an Alternative Approach to Influencer Seeding in User-Generated Content Networks” by Andreas Lanz, Jacob Goldenberg, Daniel Shapira, and Florian Stahl.

Subscribe button for Knowledhe@HEC newsletter

Newsletter knowledge

A monthly brief in your email box and 3 issues of the book per year.

follow us

Insights @HECParis School of #Management

Follow Us

Support Research

Our articles are produced thanks to our reader's support